test
| Comparison Dimension | Ceramic Brake Pads | Traditional Semi-Metallic Pads | Supplementary Analysis / Data Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase Cost | High (potentially 1.5-2.5x that of semi-metallic pads) | Low | Cost variance depends heavily on brand and vehicle model; specific quotes are needed. |
| Service Life | Over 100,000 km | Typically under 60,000 km | Actual lifespan is highly dependent on road conditions and driving habits. Some public transit case studies show ceramic pads lasting 120,000-150,000 km in urban duty cycles. |
| Impact on Rotor Wear | Low wear, can extend rotor life by over 20% | Comparatively higher wear | Reduced rotor replacement frequency and cost is a significant economic advantage. |
| Wheel Hub Cleaning Cost | Minimal dust, non-adhesive, virtually eliminates extra cleaning | Metallic dust is substantial, can corrode hubs, leading to high cleaning/refurbishment costs | This advantage is significant for companies prioritizing vehicle appearance (e.g., tour companies). |
| Comprehensive Ownership Cost | High upfront investment, but lower long-term maintenance cost | Low upfront cost, but frequent replacement and high hidden costs | A 2-3 year "Total Cost of Ownership" calculation better demonstrates the advantage of ceramic pads. |
| Recycling & Environmental Value | Added dimension: More environmentally friendly materials; potential future relevance for recycling or eco-credits. | Added dimension: Metal dust disposal may face increasingly stringent environmental regulation costs. | This represents a potential long-term trend cost, not yet widely quantified in the domestic market. |